The MSM have been spilling a lot of ink over the "success" of Obama's "leading from behind" doctrine as exhibited in Libya. Some experts in the field of geopolitics have gone so far as to extend the Libyan outcome as being but the latest in a string of unappreciated but real "successes" or at least non-failures attributable to the Nice Young Man From Chicago.
All things considered, there has been one real victory achieved by President Obama. His combination of responding to domestic political pressures--particularly the pervasive Democrat fear of being seen as "weak" on national security--combined with lofty, progressive rhetoric of the Bill Clinton sort has removed foreign policy from the election table. From his decision to allow the lethal takedown of Osama bin Laden to the murky way in which the US backed into the Libyan adventure in regime change, Obama responded more to the dictates of the public's political mood than any realistic assessment of US diplomatic needs and goals.
While it is no doubt true that defense and foreign policy will not play any discernible role in the 2012 election, which is a misfortune to say the least, the canny political sense of the incumbent in denying the Republicans any point of legitimate attack constitutes a real advantage to the Obama campaign. Also offering powerful assistance to the president's reelection effort is the combination of amazing ignorance and retro thinking which typifies the current elephantine field in its collective consideration of America's role in the world.
It is to be regretted greatly that none of the current GOP aspirants have yet gone after the record of failures which is the record of the present administration. The universe of discourse is both vast and central to the near and mid-term future of the US.
Consider Iraq. Yes, we are out of the place. That is good. But the cost of our exit has been to see failure left in the wake of the endeavor. True, the initial blunder belongs for all eternity to George W. Bush and his neocon ninny soulmates. But the Obama people knew the withdrawal date fixed by the Status of Forces Agreement was looming. They also knew that total withdrawal would be dangerous, perhaps fatally so for Iraq. So did the Iraqis. Yet, with nearly three years to act, the administration failed to find a formula which would allow sufficient troops to stay with the requisite legal immunity. Rather than search for the obvious alternatives to an act by the Iraqi parliament, Obama opted to get out of Dodge--and place the blame on the Boys In Baghdad.
Some success that--for the mullahs in Tehran and their local Iraqi henchmen.
In Afghanistan, the Obama authorized "surge" provided two results. The first was a short duration set of battlefield victories, which were meaningless given the publicly announced draw down and pull out dates giving the adversaries all they needed to know to stay the course. The second accomplishment of the Obama surge was to provide political cover and advantage as the surge forces come home before the elections.
The result was to embolden both the Taliban and Haqqini network as well as their Pakistani handlers. A second result was to undercut the will of the Karzai government to conduct the needed reforms, to develop an effective national force, or to prosecute the war with vigor. Along with the totally wrongheaded firing of General Stanley McChrystal, the date certain withdrawal schedule did nothing to enhance either the will or the operational ability of US and other foreign forces to conduct their mission with high morale and the most effective approaches on both the tactical and operational levels.
What a "success." Yes, for Islamabad and their proxies in Afghanistan.
Then there is Israel and the Palestinians. The Obama policy not only froze a bad dynamic in place, it worsened matters to a point that the two state solution has become even more unlikely now than at the end of the reign of George W. The truckling Cairo speech raised Arab expectations to a level that could not be met by a mere American president, particularly one whose guiding star was provided by domestic politics. As if that were not bad enough, the president has a very bad personal as well as political relationship with the Israeli prime minister, which in no way made it probable that Israel would go along with Washington's policy preferences.
What a success--if you are Palestinian head of government Abbas.
The "Arab Spring" had to be a success, right? After all it was the triumph of democracy over autocracy, and how can anybody see that as other than a success? Sure, it was--if you are a member of an austere, political Muslim group. As was the case in Iran all those long years ago, the legendary power of the people, the voice of the democratic ballot box, the exercise of free voting, will most probably bring austere Muslims into power. And, once there, it will take more than merely voting to get them out. (Once again see Iran as the paradigm.)
How about the "war on terror?" Fortunately our intelligence, law enforcement, and military forces are highly competent, so we have not suffered a homeland hit for ten years now. None of this is due to brilliant policy on the part of Mr Obama and his "team." On the policy level, the Obama administration has been every bit as clueless as its predecessor. BH Obama is no more willing than was George W to acknowledge that terror and other forms of asymmetrical war we have faced for more than a decade have been and are predicated on the religion. The same religion serves as the motivation of the various austere, political Islamists who carry out the acts of war and terror. Failure at the basic level of knowing the nature and character of the enemy assures the overall war will not be successful.
OK, the Geek hears you object, what about the standing of the US in the eyes of the world? It's gotta be better now than when Cowboy George was in the Oval.
You betcha, bucko. It is. And, more importantly, it is not. But that is a subject for a different post. Maybe tomorrow if the weather and the tetchy computer allow.
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Foreign Policy Success? What Successes?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment