Showing posts with label Mossad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mossad. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Wins(?) And Losses (?) In Spookworld

The wild and wacky world of spooks has been getting a fair amount of probably unwelcome play in the world's media of late. First, there is the ongoing Affair of the Dead Hamas Gunrunner in Dubai. This has been joined by the Snatch of Taliban's Number Two Heavyweight in Pakistan. The second, at least can be seen legitimately as a victory for the guys down the hall in black-ops. The first may be another black eye for the Masters of the Mossad.

Arguably the world is better off now that Mahmoud al-Mabhouh has gone to his reward. The late Mr Mabhouh was a talented, highly motivated, true believing thug of the blackest sort, a specialist in the arts of clandestine killing, fomenting terror, and supplying war. Powered by hate, zeal, and revanchism, he stood behind killings, kidnappings, and the knifefighting sort of war which has long characterized the Israeli-Arab conflict.

The Israelis no doubt wanted him dead. There is no doubt but that the government, intelligence services, and people of Israel are very happy that Mr Mabhouh is now examining the root systems of daisies up close and personal. But, there is doubt that the government of Israel and its legendary intelligence service, the Mossad, are responsible for the Mabhouh Hit.

This is not to say it is impossible for the Mossad to have shown the awesome combination of arrogance and amateur tradecraft which is so evident in the events surrounding the death of al-Mabhouh. The mind rebels against the notion that the often highly competent Mossad could have been so indifferent to the presence and capacities of closed circuit surveillance television systems as to leave a virtual minute-by-minute record of the eleven person team's presence and actions. The mind also boggles at the Mossad being so totally out-to-lunch as to counterfeit passports so poorly (not using an alphanumeric coding for example) as to invite easy identification.

(A side question: How come the eagle-eyed pass control officials of Dubai missed the glaring errors on the passports, particularly those purportedly issued by the Irish and German governments? Given that governments notify each other as to the format of passports, it is hard to understand how these obviously false documents got by the border guards and customs men.)

Balancing these concerns is historical reality. From time to time the Mossad, apparently driven by a misplaced belief in its own press releases, has performed with exceptional arrogance and ineptitude. One occasion was the unfortunate hit conducted in Norway on an innocent Lebanese waiter misidentified as a terrorist figure of note. Another was the badly botched assassination attempt in Jordan in 1997 which left the Israelis covered with embarrassment, the head of Mossad sacked, and Jordan's king outraged.

Benjamin Netanyahu was prime minister in 1997. He is PM again today. The Mossad director back then was an overly muscular sort. So is Meir Dagan, who has been capo of Israel's spooks for eight years now.

Mossad has enjoyed a great deal of presumed success in eliminating Israel's enemies using clandestine and covert means. They have not been immune to allowing success to be imputed improperly to their efforts rather than pointing out the potential for internecine rivalries to have been behind the death of one enemy or another. Indeed, the Israelis have turned the reputation of the Mossad into an impressive weapon in their psychological warfare arsenal.

As a result it would not behoove the Israeli government to deny involvement in the death of al-Mabhouh. At the same time the customs of international protocol prohibit claiming responsibility. So, the Israeli ForMin was right in neither denying nor accepting Mossad's role in the killing.

As long as studied ambiguity surrounds the Dubai Affair, no government other than that of Dubai is going to be particularly perturbed by the demise of Mr Mabhouh. He was a throughly unpleasant character with whom one dealt only because state policy required. If the Dubai chief of police had not been so personally annoyed by the blatant nature of the killing and the almost defiant way in which it was conducted, it is doubtful that anyone in the United Arab Emirates would have been disturbed by the event.

However, the chief has put his head on the line in the case so now other governments must as well. The British are taking the matter seriously. So also are the Irish and Germans. This means, at the least, a great show of "getting to the bottom of matters" must be made over the next few days and weeks. Ultimately, this may very well rebound to the overall diplomatic and political disadvantage of Israel--particularly if Mossad was involved even indirectly.

If Mossad was carrying out the instructions of its government, some very real soul searching is necessary. No, there is no need to contemplate the ethics of the killing: it was well deserved by the recipient. Rather, the "Institute" must re-examine its tendency toward an unfortunate and periodic exhibitionism. There is a reason for clandestine and covert operations--not to get caught, not to be indicted, and, most assuredly, not to be convicted even in the court of public opinion.

The "win" column for the spooks is headed by the capture of Mullah Baradar by a combination of CIA and the Pakistani Directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI.) Baradar has been on the top of the capture list since December for the US. Killing him would have been OK but catching him was far preferable. Finally, a fortuitous happening apparently allowed CIA to connect all the relevant dots and, with ISI in tow, take the Mullah into durance vile.

The Pakistanis had a couple of good reasons to cooperate whole heartedly in the take down as not only has the US finally agreed to furnish them with (unarmed) small UAVs but Islamabad has come to realize that only by cooperating can they keep themselves in play for influence in Afghanistan following the defeat of Taliban. It appears the Pakistani government has decided that the US is likely to achieve its minimum necessary strategic goal of not-losing in Afghanistan and now is looking at how best to play the endgame.

Baradar is currently in Pakistani hands with CIA playing an observer role. This implies that the interrogation will be more robust than if the mullah were in American custody. The consequences in terms of organisational disruption for Taliban are likely to be severe and quite negative. Taken together with the ongoing Predator strikes and the offensive in Helmand province, the future for the Fearless Thugs of Taliban does not look as bright as it did a month or two ago.

It is unfortunate that the same cannot be said of Hamas in the aftermath of the killing of al-Mabhouh. But, in the world of spooks one out of two ain't half bad.




Wednesday, February 18, 2009

People (And The Media) Talk Too Much

Politicians like to put their mouths in gear without engaging their brains. (This political practice must be considered separately from the custom of "government by leak" in which the loose lipped politico or bureaucrat hopes to sink a policy proposal with which they disagree by a carefully calculated leak.)

A recent example of the blubber-tongued politician is Senator Dianne Feinstein who cheerfully and thoughtlessly blabbed during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing. She commented to the Director of National Intelligence, DNI, that she understood the highly lethal and (in Pakistan at least) equally controversial Predator operations against al-Qaeda and Taliban heavies in the FATA were operated from bases near Islamabad.

The DNI did not respond.

While anyone with even the slightest knowledge of Predator capabilities would have long assumed the crossover point between reaction time and loiter time would be optimised from a base in Pakistan rather than one, say, in Afghanistan, there is no need to comment upon this. The strong probability that Predators were flown from one of the complex of bases near Islamabad is enhanced by the decades of cooperation between CIA and its Pakistani counterpart the Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI.)

Given the negative reactions to the Predator/Hellfire strikes within certain segments of the Pakistani population (read "Islamists") it is necessary for the government of Pakistan to loudly and repeatedly decry the operations. Mollifying internal opinion by such outcries is a long hallowed tradition. And, not just in Pakistan.

Senator Feinstein's comment was both unnecessary and destabilizing of an already very shaky regime in Islamabad. The lame explanation by a press spokesperson later that day in no way lessened the potential damage nor made the Senator look any more perceptive and guarded in her mouth-flapping gust.

The Geek has wondered at the discretion and judiciousness of the press ever since Jack Anderson in one of his recurrent searches for sensation blew the cover on an exceptionally successful program of electronic eavesdropping directed at the Kremlin leadership a quarter century ago. Such exposure of sensitive and lucrative intelligence operations is no credit to the teller of secrets and can be quite harmful to his country's intelligence efforts.

Now the media have done it again. This time the cover-blower was not American but rather British. And, the target of the media exposure was not an action of the British services but those of Israel and the United States.

In a coordinated program CIA and Mossad have been seeking to delay the Iranian government in its quest for the Mahdi Bomb. There is no thought by either agency or the two governments which approved the program that the effort will prevent the Tehran regime from acquiring a nuclear capacity.

The goal has been to delay progress in that direction. To buy time in order that the so far bootless diplomatic efforts to assure Iran does not join the nuclear club might, just might, show success.

To this end the agencies have pursued sabotage and assassination. Iranian nuclear scientists and other personnel key to the program have died "under mysterious circumstances." Computers and other critical, vulnerable equipment have failed to operate effectively. Glitches and gremlins have been introduced throughout the program both in Iran and elsewhere.

How much delay has been introduced is an open question. But any sand in the gears is to the good.

Undoubtedly the Iranians suspect that they have been the target of impairing actions as they have been of espionage. Still, there is no need to let them know their suspicions are dead on.

Sure, assassinations and sabotage are icky-poo. The Mahdi Bomb is far more so.